Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Learning from a Project “ Post-mortem”


In my previous position at my current organization, I was given the opportunity to work on a project to create a handbook for the administrative assistant throughout the organization. The handbook had to contain training guides for many of the everyday functions for the administrative assistants. In order for this handbook to be effective, the group had to gather the information that would be of great value to the assistants. To do so, the group interviewed six of the executive assistants at the organization. Interviewing the executive assistants did not pose a problem; however, the assistants were so busy that it took approximately three weeks to complete the interviews to gain the knowledge we needed for the handbook.  After gaining the information, it was decided that someone would need to analyze the information. We needed to know what was of importance and what was needed to move forward with the project.
In my opinion, we interview too many assistants. I believe the project could have been productive with three interviews. Because so many of the assistants were interviewed, we had to wait to gather their input, and the project having to be put on hold for three weeks while we wait on these assistants, there was wasted time.  The stakeholders wanted the project to be completed within two months and three weeks were wasted waiting.
The information gathered was analyzed by the team and developed into a handbook/training manual on how to set up new employees in the IT global system, how to set conference calls, order new laptops and/or desktops, etc. Once the manual was produce and given to the assistants throughout the organization, we found that there were things missing from the manual (i.e. how to setup new telephones, order corporate credit cards, and how to complete travel arrangements). I believe the time that we were awaiting the executive assistants; we could have reached out to a few lower level assistants and managers. I believe their inputs could have prevented the missing information that was not included in the handbook. More importantly, we could have use the idle time working on the project, oppose to waiting around on someone else.

The positive side of completing this project, the assistants globally, now have a handbook/training manual that can be used as a resource at any time. This will cut down on having to call someone else to aid in completing a task. This handbook/training manual can be found on the company’s intranet site for all assistants who are new to the organization. This is the most gratifying part of it all, the assistants can submit items, they believe can be beneficial to other assistants, to the site and the project coordinators take the time to review the items and decide if the will be added to the manual. This project is now the work of all assistants throughout the organization.